tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29230700.post4073077439389222074..comments2016-08-22T10:44:02.230-05:00Comments on outside the box: OraSRP v3.0b - a very short initial impressionjforondahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17229528787660811259noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29230700.post-68515334839222678142007-03-08T10:27:00.000-05:002007-03-08T10:27:00.000-05:00This is just a note to those who may be following ...This is just a note to those who may be following the comments.<BR/><BR/>My reply to Egor's comments are in succeeding posts. Links to these posts are in the bottom of the body of this post.jforondahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17229528787660811259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29230700.post-15441856459305332452007-03-01T09:13:00.000-05:002007-03-01T09:13:00.000-05:00Thanks for dropping by, Egor. I'm in the middle of...Thanks for dropping by, Egor. <BR/><BR/>I'm in the middle of something right now but I will reply tonight (Americas time), if not earlier. <BR/><BR/>Jamesjforondahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17229528787660811259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29230700.post-65144971938407442422007-03-01T04:56:00.000-05:002007-03-01T04:56:00.000-05:00> Please note the second arrow pointing at "Total ...<I>> Please note the second arrow pointing at "Total lines processed in trace file". OraSRP is reporting 2,150,340 lines.</I><BR/><BR/>OraSRP ignores some lines like<BR/>'===' or '*** 2007-02-28 12:45:08.424' and doesn't report them as 'processed'. So, 'Total lines processed in trace file' != 'Total lines in trace file'.<BR/><BR/><I>> So according to the raw trace file, the elapsed time is approximately 14,171 seconds.</I> <BR/><BR/>It depends on how to calculate elapsed time.<BR/>For example, OraSRP ignores 'tim' in 'PARSING IN CURSOR' lines. <BR/>Also, if trace file starts from WAIT lines then OraSRP will sum up elapsed times of such waits and substract it from the first 'tim' value.<BR/><BR/>As for different times with/without idle waits recognition -- I believe it's a bug. Unfortunatey, I can't reproduce it yet, so I can't fix it too.egorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00292831520490238675noreply@blogger.com